Everything Hertz
By Dan Quintana
Listen to a podcast, please open Podcast Republic app. Available on Google Play Store and Apple App Store.
Image by Dan Quintana
Category: Social Sciences
Open in Apple Podcasts
Open RSS feed
Open Website
Rate for this podcast
Subscribers: 168
Reviews: 0
Episodes: 190
Description
Methodology, scientific life, and bad language. Co-hosted by Dr. Dan Quintana (University of Oslo) and Dr. James Heathers (Cipher Skin)
| Episode | Date |
|---|---|
|
190: What happens when you pay reviewers?
|
Apr 02, 2025 |
|
189: Crit me baby, one more time
|
Mar 02, 2025 |
|
188: Double-blind peer review vs. scientific integrity
|
Jan 30, 2025 |
|
187: What started the replication crisis era?
|
Dec 03, 2024 |
|
186: Evaluating journal quality
|
Nov 13, 2024 |
|
185: The Retraction
|
Oct 04, 2024 |
|
184: A race to the bottom
|
Sep 05, 2024 |
|
183: Too beautiful to be true
|
Aug 03, 2024 |
|
182: What practices should the behavioural sciences borrow (and ignore) from other research fields?
|
Jul 02, 2024 |
|
181: Down the rabbit hole
|
Jun 03, 2024 |
|
180: Consortium peer reviews
|
May 02, 2024 |
|
179: Discovery vs. maintenance
|
Apr 03, 2024 |
|
178: Alerting researchers about retractions
|
Feb 29, 2024 |
|
177: Plagiarism
|
Jan 31, 2024 |
|
176: Tracking academic workloads
|
Dec 29, 2023 |
|
175: Defending against the scientific dark arts
|
Dec 07, 2023 |
|
174: Smug missionaries with test tubes
|
Nov 01, 2023 |
|
173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?
|
Oct 01, 2023 |
|
172: In defence of the discussion section
|
Aug 31, 2023 |
|
171: The easiest person to fool is yourself (with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris)
|
Jul 20, 2023 |
|
170: Holy sheet
|
Jun 23, 2023 |
|
169: Using big data to understand behavior (Live episode with Sandra Matz)
|
May 31, 2023 |
|
168: Meta-meta-science
|
Apr 27, 2023 |
|
167: Diluted effect sizes
|
Mar 16, 2023 |
|
166: Is science becoming less disruptive over time?
|
Jan 25, 2023 |
|
165: Self-promotion
|
Dec 30, 2022 |
|
164: The great migration
|
Nov 28, 2022 |
|
163: eLife's new peer review model
|
Nov 07, 2022 |
|
162: Status bias in peer review
|
Oct 17, 2022 |
|
161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)
|
Sep 12, 2022 |
|
160: Whistleblowing
|
Aug 31, 2022 |
|
159: Peer review isn't working (with Saloni Dattani)
|
Aug 15, 2022 |
|
158: Word limits
|
Aug 01, 2022 |
|
157: Limitations
|
Jul 11, 2022 |
|
156: Looking for seeders
|
Jun 21, 2022 |
|
155: Don't you know who I am?
|
May 30, 2022 |
|
154: When the evidence is constructed around the narrative
|
May 09, 2022 |
|
153: Shame shame shame
|
Apr 18, 2022 |
|
152: Sorry Not Sorry
|
Apr 04, 2022 |
|
151: The dirty dozen
|
Mar 21, 2022 |
|
150: Why can't you do nothing?
|
Feb 28, 2022 |
|
149: Medical misinformation (with Rohin Francis)
|
Feb 14, 2022 |
|
148: Academic reference letters
|
Jan 31, 2022 |
|
147: The $7000 golden ticket
|
Jan 17, 2022 |
|
146: Skills pay bills
|
Dec 27, 2021 |
|
145: Our boat is sinking slightly slower
|
Dec 13, 2021 |
|
144: The role of luck in academia
|
Nov 15, 2021 |
|
143: A little less conversation, a little more action
|
Nov 01, 2021 |
|
142: Red flags in academia [Live episode]
|
Oct 18, 2021 |
|
141: Why we should diversify study samples (with Sakshi Ghai)
|
Oct 04, 2021 |
|
140: You can’t buy cat biscuits with ‘thank you’ emails
|
Sep 20, 2021 |
|
139: Open science from a funder's perspective (with Ashley Farley)
|
Sep 06, 2021 |
|
138: Preprints in the time of coronavirus (with Michele Avissar-Whiting)
|
Aug 16, 2021 |
|
137: Ten rules for improving academic work-life balance
|
Aug 02, 2021 |
|
136: Who peer-reviews the peer-reviewed journals?
|
Jul 19, 2021 |
|
135: A loss of confidence
|
Jul 05, 2021 |
|
134: Paywalled questionnaires
|
Jun 21, 2021 |
|
133: Manuscript submission fees
|
Jun 07, 2021 |
|
132: Post-pandemic academia
|
May 17, 2021 |
|
131: Long live the overhead projector!
|
May 03, 2021 |
|
130: Normalizing retractions (with Dorothy Bishop)
|
Apr 19, 2021 |
|
129: Transparency audits
|
Apr 05, 2021 |
|
128: How do you generate new research ideas?
|
Mar 15, 2021 |
|
127: Speak up or shut up?
|
Mar 01, 2021 |
|
126: The division of scientific labor (with Saloni Dattani)
|
Feb 15, 2021 |
|
125: Upon reasonable request
|
Feb 01, 2021 |
|
124: From Ptolemy to Takeshi's Castle
|
Jan 18, 2021 |
|
123: Authenticated anonymity (with Michael Eisen)
|
Jan 04, 2021 |
|
122: Reoptimizing scientific publishing for the internet age (with Michael Eisen)
|
Dec 21, 2020 |
|
121: Transparent peer review
|
Dec 07, 2020 |
|
120: How false beliefs spread in science (with Cailin O'Connor)
|
Nov 16, 2020 |
|
119: Rules of thumb
|
Nov 02, 2020 |
|
118: Evidence-free gatekeeping
|
Oct 19, 2020 |
|
117: How we peer-review papers
|
Oct 05, 2020 |
|
116: In my opinion
|
Sep 21, 2020 |
|
115: A modest proposal
|
Sep 07, 2020 |
|
114: Diversity in science (with Jess Wade)
|
Aug 17, 2020 |
|
113: Citation needed
|
Aug 03, 2020 |
|
112: Leaving academia
|
Jul 27, 2020 |
|
111: The cumulative advantage of academic capital (with Chris Jackson)
|
Jul 06, 2020 |
|
110: Red flags for errors in papers
|
Jun 15, 2020 |
|
109: Open scientific publishing [Live episode]
|
Jun 01, 2020 |
|
108: Requiem for a Screen
|
May 18, 2020 |
|
107: Memes, TikTok, and science communication (with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti)
|
May 04, 2020 |
|
106: Science on the run
|
Apr 20, 2020 |
|
105: Tell it like it is (with Marike Schiffer)
|
Apr 06, 2020 |
|
104: Now we'll discover which meetings could've been emails
|
Mar 16, 2020 |
|
103: Swiping right
|
Mar 02, 2020 |
|
102: Master of none
|
Feb 17, 2020 |
|
101: Punishing research misconduct
|
Feb 03, 2020 |
|
100: Hundredth episode live special (with Daniel Lakens, Amy Orben, and Chris Chambers)
|
Jan 27, 2020 |
|
99: Science advocacy
|
Jan 06, 2020 |
|
98: Episode titles are redundant, at best (with Sophia Crüwell)
|
Dec 16, 2019 |
|
97: Slow science
|
Dec 02, 2019 |
|
96: The chaotic state of doctoral research
|
Nov 18, 2019 |
|
95: All good presentations are alike; each bad presentation is bad in its own way
|
Nov 04, 2019 |
|
94: Predicting the replicability of research
|
Oct 21, 2019 |
|
93: Double-blind peer review vs. open science
|
Oct 07, 2019 |
|
92: Chaos in the brickyard
|
Sep 16, 2019 |
|
91: Shifting the goalposts in statistics (with Kristin Sainani)
|
Sep 02, 2019 |
|
90: Mo data mo problems
|
Aug 19, 2019 |
|
89: Conflicts of interest in psychology (with Tom Chivers)
|
Aug 05, 2019 |
|
88: The pomodoro episode
|
Jul 15, 2019 |
|
87: Improving the scientific poster (with Mike Morrison)
|
Jul 01, 2019 |
|
86: Should I stay or should I go?
|
Jun 17, 2019 |
|
85: GWAS big teeth you have, grandmother (with Kevin Mitchell)
|
Jun 03, 2019 |
|
84: A GPS in the Garden of Forking Paths (with Amy Orben)
|
May 21, 2019 |
|
83: Back to our dirty unwashed roots
|
May 08, 2019 |
|
82: More janitors and fewer architects
|
Apr 15, 2019 |
|
81: Too Young To Know, Too Old To Care
|
Apr 01, 2019 |
|
80: Cites are not endorsements (with Sean Rife)
|
Mar 17, 2019 |
|
79: Clinical trial reporting (with Henry Drysdale)
|
Mar 03, 2019 |
|
78: Large-scale collaborative science (with Lisa DeBruine)
|
Feb 17, 2019 |
|
77: Promiscuous expertise
|
Feb 04, 2019 |
|
76: Open peer review
|
Jan 21, 2019 |
|
75: Overlay journals (with Daniele Marinazzo)
|
Jan 07, 2019 |
|
74: Seeing double (with Elisabeth Bik)
|
Dec 19, 2018 |
|
73: Update your damn syllabus
|
Dec 03, 2018 |
|
72: Anonymity in scientific publishing
|
Nov 16, 2018 |
|
71: Moving for your job
|
Nov 05, 2018 |
|
70: Doubling-blinding dog balls
|
Oct 15, 2018 |
|
69: Open science tools (with Brian Nosek)
|
Oct 09, 2018 |
|
68: Friends don’t let friends believe in impact factors (with Nathan Hall)
|
Sep 03, 2018 |
|
67: Shit Academics Say (with Nathan Hall)
|
Aug 20, 2018 |
|
66: Ideal worlds vs grim truths
|
Aug 06, 2018 |
|
65: Blockchain and open science (with Jon Brock)
|
Jul 16, 2018 |
|
64: Salami slicing
|
Jul 02, 2018 |
|
63: Science journalism (with Brian Resnick)
|
Jun 18, 2018 |
|
62: Adopting open science practices (with Dorothy Bishop)
|
Jun 04, 2018 |
|
61: Performance enhancing thugs (with Greg Nuckols)
|
May 21, 2018 |
|
60: This is more of a comment than a question
|
May 08, 2018 |
|
59: Rethinking the scientific journal (with Rickard Carlsson)
|
Apr 16, 2018 |
|
58: Lessons from podcasting (with Simine Vazire)
|
Apr 02, 2018 |
|
57: Radical Transparency (with Rebecca Willén)
|
Mar 15, 2018 |
|
56: Registered reports (with Chris Chambers)
|
Feb 02, 2018 |
|
55: The proposal to redefine clinical trials
|
Jan 18, 2018 |
|
54: Cuckoo Science
|
Dec 15, 2017 |
|
53: Skin in the game
|
Nov 17, 2017 |
|
52: Give p's a chance (with Daniel Lakens)
|
Oct 20, 2017 |
|
51: Preprints (with Jessica Polka)
|
Oct 06, 2017 |
|
50: Special 50th episode (LIVE)
|
Sep 14, 2017 |
|
49: War and p's
|
Jul 31, 2017 |
|
48: Breaking up with the impact factor (with Jason Hoyt)
|
Jul 21, 2017 |
|
47: Truth bombs from a methodological freedom fighter (with Anne Scheel)
|
Jul 07, 2017 |
|
46: Statistical literacy (with Andy Field)
|
Jun 23, 2017 |
|
45: Conferences and conspiracy theories
|
Jun 02, 2017 |
|
44: Who’s afraid of the New Bad People? (with Nick Brown)
|
May 19, 2017 |
|
43: Death, taxes, and publication bias in meta-analysis (with Daniel Lakens)
|
May 05, 2017 |
|
42: Some of my best friends are Bayesians (with Daniel Lakens)
|
Apr 21, 2017 |
|
41: Objecting to published research (with William Gunn)
|
Apr 07, 2017 |
|
40: Meta-research (with Michèle Nuijten)
|
Mar 24, 2017 |
|
39: Academic hipsters
|
Mar 10, 2017 |
|
38: Work/life balance - Part 2
|
Feb 24, 2017 |
|
37: Work/life balance in academia
|
Feb 17, 2017 |
|
36: Statistical inconsistencies in published research
|
Jan 27, 2017 |
|
35: A manifesto for reproducible science
|
Jan 20, 2017 |
|
34: E-health (with Robin Kok)
|
Dec 22, 2016 |
|
33: Zombie theories
|
Dec 16, 2016 |
|
32: Can worrying about getting sick make you sicker?
|
Dec 01, 2016 |
|
31: Discover your psychiatric risk with this one weird trick
|
Nov 16, 2016 |
|
30: Authorship
|
Nov 02, 2016 |
|
29: Learning new skills
|
Oct 16, 2016 |
|
28: Positive developments in biomedical science
|
Sep 30, 2016 |
|
27: Complaints and grievances
|
Sep 23, 2016 |
|
26: Interpreting effect sizes
|
Sep 09, 2016 |
|
25: Misunderstanding p-values
|
Aug 27, 2016 |
|
24: Incentive structures in science
|
Aug 17, 2016 |
|
23: Serious academics
|
Aug 11, 2016 |
|
22: Pokemon and public health
|
Aug 03, 2016 |
|
21: This is your brain on steroids
|
Jul 22, 2016 |
|
20: Sample sizes in psychology studies
|
Jul 13, 2016 |
|
19: Let us spray: oxytocin and spirituality
|
Jul 06, 2016 |
|
18: Data sharing
|
Jun 29, 2016 |
|
17: Journals: Do we need them?
|
Jun 22, 2016 |
|
16: What makes a good psych study?
|
Jun 15, 2016 |
|
15: Software and coding
|
Jun 08, 2016 |
|
14: Science communication
|
Jun 02, 2016 |
|
13: Academic horror stories
|
May 26, 2016 |
|
12: Reporting heart rate variability studies
|
May 21, 2016 |
|
11: The placebo effect
|
May 10, 2016 |
|
10: Failure
|
May 04, 2016 |
|
9: What happens if your research is wrong?
|
Apr 28, 2016 |
|
8: The PhD to Postdoc transition
|
Apr 20, 2016 |
|
Episode 7: 7: The writing process
|
Apr 15, 2016 |
|
6: The research pipeline - getting from idea to publication
|
Apr 07, 2016 |
|
5: Do you even replicate?
|
Mar 30, 2016 |
|
4: Meta-analysis or mega-silliness?
|
Mar 22, 2016 |
|
3: Scientific publishing
|
Mar 16, 2016 |
|
2: Nutrition and Psychiatry
|
Mar 09, 2016 |
|
1: So you want to measure heart rate variability...
|
Mar 02, 2016 |